Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Arthur C. Clarke

Arthur C. Clarke is best known for writing the Oscar nominated screenplay for 2001: A Space Odyssey, which is generally considered one of the greatest science fiction films of all time.  He was a radar specialist in WWII and that led to his his work in proposing using satellites as communications relays.  Most of his work has to do with space exploration and first contact with aliens and he has a hard science fiction focus on the technology that would let mankind do interplanetary exploration in our solar system.  Generally he does not focus much on characterization and mostly his characters are forgettable, with the great exception of HAL 9000 in the film 2001 who is generally considered one of the most memorable film villains of all time.

2001
He simultaneously wrote the novel and screenplay for 2001 while collaborating with Stanley Kubrik.   The story begins with an extended scene of humanities ascent from apelike creatures to a tool and weapon using creature millions of years ago in part do to a mysterious monolith given to the creatures by aliens.  Fast forward to modern times where the bulk of the story takes place.   Scientists have discovered a monolith on the moon and have concluded that some alien negligence has placed it there after it sends a radio signal to a moon of Saturn (in the film its Jupiter).  A group of astronauts is on a doomed mission to Saturn to investigate.  Most of the astronauts are in hibernation during the journey and the 2 non-hibernating scientists must determine why HAL, the intelligent computer running the ship, is malfunctioning.

While the movie often leaves audiences confused, the novel focuses much more why these things are occurring and is easier to follow than the movie, which is more heavy with visual symbolism.  Most of themes are questions of are we alone in the universe with a good bit of hard science fiction of how long and difficult interplanetary travel would be and the nature of artificial intelligence.  He followed this up with 3 more novels, 2010 (also a film), 2061, and 3001.  This novel is appropriate for teenage readers.  It has a little violence, but it is not graphic or the focus of the story.

Rendezvous with Rama
A first contact focused Hugo and Nebula Award winning novel written in 1972, this is the most interesting of the three Clarke novels I have read.  A giant 50+ KM long spaceship arrives in our solar system in the year 2130 and scientists send a ship called the Endeavor to investigate.  Most of the novel is focused on how the alien ship works and the crew spends a good bit of time investigating the ecosystem inside the ship.  He goes into a lot of details about how the aliens built everything in triplicate, how people might go about exploring a ship like this, and how the interior of the ship functions, while leaving a good bit of mystery about what the aliens are actually like.

I was left wanting more and he set up the novel well for sequels, but he did not actually write the sequels that came out himself and I have read that they are not nearly as interesting.  Morgan Freeman wanted to make a movie of this book, but it looks like it will not happen any time soon.  This is appropriate for teens and is good for any hard science fiction fan.

Fountains of Paradise
This is a close second to Rendezvous with Rama in how much I enjoyed it and is another Hugo and Nubula award winning novel, this time revolving around the construction of a space elevator.  It was the first major introduction of a space elevator in fiction, which is a satellite in geostationay orbit that connects to the Earth though some sort of filament or wire and makes it relatively inexpensive to repeatedly send objects into space.  Since then space elevators have appeared in many other stories.  Most of the novel deals with the details of 22nd century engineer Vannever Morgan building one on the fictional island Trapobane, which is similar to Clarke's home of Sri Lanka.  It has a major subplot focused on the fictionalized life of an ancient king Kalidasa and the main protagonist getting permission to build the elevator on a monastery take up much of the book.

The novel's real focus is in the details since not much happens drama wise.  Instead there is a focus on showing that is could be done on Mars, convincing the world to build one in this particular place, and then what it would take for the years worth of work and technology to make it happen.  There is not much action in this novel and most of the characters are forgettable, though Morgan is at least interesting in his focus and drive.  Like Clarke's other novels it is appropriate for a teen audience although some might get a bit bored if they don't find the technical details interesting.

Monday, February 24, 2014

What I Include In Reviews

Very brief biography of author.

Summary and review of major works they have done, with a focus on the ones I have read and what I think is interesting about them.

I will identify what ages I think the books are appropriate for and what I think parents might want to watch out for, which often varies significantly among the author’s books.

Readalikes and related media.

Brief Criteria For Reviews

I have to have read at least one book by the author.  


Either I or a large number of other people think the author is good, for instance by getting ahugo award nomination.(an annual award given by professional science fiction writers)

It has to be science fiction, but I will include occasional fantasy writers, particularly fantasy writers who also write scifi.  A brief definition is fiction that is focused around a theoretical scientific concept or where the author has created a new fictional technology or other alternate universe where things work differently than they do in the real world  The author incorporates those differences and their consequences into the themes or plot of the story. Often it is set in the future or a different world.  

The common breakdown is hard science fiction, which has a strong focus on the real world or potential real world science and technology and soft science fiction, where the science exists mainly to propel the story.  Fantasy is similar, but is often set in the past and uses whatever magic rules the author wants to use to effect their story.

Friday, February 21, 2014

Mission of this Blog

Mission: To give science fiction book recommendations to parents who want to get their teenagers to read more on their own.

The Problem: Most parents want their children to read more books and to impart a love of reading, but often don’t know to what to get their kids to read that is both high quality and that they will actually enjoy reading.


I read a lot of books as a teen on my own and still read about one book a week, but most of my classmates did not read books voluntarily for pleasure.  And the titles we read in school were either what the teacher wanted to read or what the district assigned.  They were usually not that interesting to my fellow students and even if they were fun to read, the lesson plans often managed to drain the pleasure out of reading.  Sometimes they were books more appropriate for adults or were high quality, but not of much interest to teens.  So by the end of high school the majority of my peers had almost no interest in reading good books on their own despite being force fed a steady diet of what educated adults considered good “classics”.


One of the genres that I, and many of my male friends in particular, liked was science fiction.  Those books often had tie ins with movies or other media; they had plenty of action and complex plots; they had themes and characters we could identify with; and most important they had interesting new ideas, settings, and science to immerse us into their worlds and stories.  Many of the well educated adult men I am friends with  now still stick with science fiction, and its cousin fantasy, for most of their pleasure reading.

Unfortunately, there is more chaff than wheat when it comes to books and a much of the science fiction out there is not worth reading.  On top of it many of the well written books have material many parents won’t want their minor children reading, at least until they are older.  I post reviews based around individual authors and try to cover a variety of their work when possible.  This includes authors from the late nineteenth century to current authors.  

I hope this is particularly helpful to parents who may be homeschooling or who otherwise want their kids to read on their own, but don’t know where to start. Adults will hopefully like most of what I recommend as well.